Fact Check: No, Mike Tyson Did Not Name a List of Rappers Who Slept with Diddy
A wave of viral content on TikTok and YouTube has reignited conspiracy-laden speculation around Sean “Diddy” Combs, this time dragging boxing icon Mike Tyson into the fray. At the center of the claim? A video allegedly showing Tyson naming a list of celebrities—mostly rappers and entertainers—who were romantically involved with Diddy. The problem? There is no credible evidence this ever happened.
Here’s what we know, what’s being claimed, and why this narrative is quickly unraveling under scrutiny.

The Origin of the Claim
The rumor stems from a TikTok video uploaded by the user Black Star Update on March 31, 2023. The clip, viewed over 420,000 times, featured a thumbnail declaring:
“Mike Tyson EXPOSES List of Celebs Diddy Slept With…”
The image included Tyson’s face alongside celebrity names such as Jay-Z, Meek Mill, Rick Ross, Usher, Justin Bieber, Will Smith, Prince Harry, and Yung Miami. A quote attributed to Tyson read, “I HAVE PROOF!”
The video itself, however, offers none. No clip of Tyson making such a claim. No evidence. No documentation. Just a stitched-together montage of headlines, images, and other unrelated content aimed at evoking shock rather than providing substance.
The Video Source: A Chain of Misinformation
The TikTok video is actually a repackaged snippet taken from a longer 20-minute YouTube video posted by the account Stardom Scoop on March 30, 2024. That video, too, offered no concrete source or quote linking Mike Tyson to such accusations.
Instead, it mixed archived footage of Tyson, news coverage about Diddy’s ongoing legal battles, and general commentary about celebrity culture. At no point in the video does Tyson say, confirm, or even hint at having personal knowledge of Diddy’s relationships.
This tactic — presenting clickbait thumbnails and headlines that are never addressed in the video — is common in online “conspiracy theater” content.
What Does Tyson Say? Absolutely Nothing of the Sort.
Newsweek reached out to Mike Tyson’s team and received a direct statement dismissing the claim.
“There’s no truth to this. Mike Tyson never made those comments,” a media representative said.
In short, the clip’s creators took liberties with Tyson’s image and reputation, putting words in his mouth that he never said, to stir controversy and drive traffic.
Why the Diddy Speculation Keeps Coming Back
In March 2024, the Department of Homeland Security raided Diddy’s residences in both Los Angeles and Miami as part of an investigation into alleged sex trafficking and other related crimes. Footage from the Miami raid showed two of Combs’ sons, Justin and Christian, handcuffed outside the home.

Although no one was arrested or charged at the time, the optics of the raid and the serious nature of the allegations rekindled public interest and speculation around Diddy’s private life.
Social media, particularly TikTok and YouTube, became ground zero for this speculation — a space where algorithms reward content that feels explosive, whether it’s true or not.
The “Secret List” Phenomenon and Its Roots in Online Culture
The idea that there’s a secret “list” of celebrities involved in questionable or scandalous behavior isn’t new.
Most infamously, conspiracy theorists have long referenced an “Epstein list” — an alleged document naming high-profile individuals connected to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Despite years of investigation and many of Epstein’s real connections being documented, no such definitive list has ever emerged, and much of what circulates online is either fabricated or misrepresented.
The Tyson-Diddy rumor follows a similar pattern. It leverages the public’s fascination with hidden truths, elite circles, and the fall of powerful people, often with little regard for facts or due process.
The Role of TikTok in Spreading Misinformation
Platforms like TikTok, while excellent for entertainment and creativity, have become notorious for their role in amplifying unverified and sensational claims.
The video from Black Star Update is just one of several posted by that account with nearly identical titles and thumbnails. These recycled videos are not only misleading — they’re strategically designed to game TikTok’s algorithm for virality.
As Newsweek noted, there are no court documents, official statements, or media reports verifying that Tyson ever made any of the statements featured in these viral videos. In fact, all available evidence suggests the opposite.
Why This Matters
Even though most users understand the internet isn’t always truthful, claims like these are dangerous for several reasons:
They exploit high-profile investigations to promote clickbait narratives.
They erode trust in legitimate journalism and legal processes.
They drag uninvolved public figures (in this case, Mike Tyson) into rumors with zero accountability.
And they contribute to an environment where conspiracy outpaces fact — often with real reputational consequences.
The Verdict
✅ FALSE
There is no evidence that Mike Tyson named a list of celebrities who slept with Sean “Diddy” Combs. The TikTok clips and YouTube videos spreading this claim are based on misleading headlines, edited images, and fabricated quotes.
The Tyson clip does not exist. The list does not exist. And the claim appears to have been crafted solely to drive clicks — not uncover truth.
As with all viral rumors, it’s worth asking:
If something this explosive were true, wouldn’t real journalists, legal teams, or court records confirm it?
Don’t Let the Headline Fool You
While the allegations against Diddy are serious and currently under federal investigation, the claim that Mike Tyson exposed a celebrity list tied to the case is simply untrue. It’s another example of how the internet can distort reality — especially when a headline is more exciting than the truth.
News
The auditorium glitched into silence the moment Joel Osteen leaned toward the mic and delivered a line no pastor is supposed to say in public. Even the stage lights seemed to hesitate as his voice echoed out: “God will NEVER forgive you.” People froze mid-applause. Kid Rock’s head snapped up. And in that weird, suspended moment, the crowd realized something had just detonated off-script.
The crowd expected an inspiring evening of testimony, music, and conversation. What they got instead was one of the most explosive on-stage confrontations ever witnessed inside a church auditorium. It happened fast—36 seconds, to be exact.But those 36 seconds would…
The room stalled mid-breath the moment Mike Johnson snapped open a black folder that wasn’t on any official docket. Cameras zoomed. Staffers froze. The label on the cover — CLINTON: THE SERVER SAGA — hit like a siren. Johnson leaned toward the mic, voice sharpened enough to scratch glass, and read a line that made every timeline jolt: “Her email is criminal.”
Here’s the thing about made-for-TV government: it knows exactly when to hold a beat. Tuesday’s oversight hearing had the rhythm down cold—routine questioning, polite skirmishes, staffers passing notes like we’re all pretending this is not a stage. And then Mike…
🔥 “THE FLOOR SHOOK BEFORE ANYONE COULD SPEAK.” — Investigator Dane Bonaro didn’t walk into the chamber — he tore through it, slamming a blood-red binder onto the desk with a force that made the microphones hiss. The label on the cover froze the room mid-breath: “1.4 MILLION SHADOW BALLOTS.” He locked eyes with the council and snarled, “You want the truth? Start with this.” For one suspended second, every camera operator lifted their lens like they’d just smelled a political explosion.
Here’s a scene you’ve watched a hundred times if you’ve spent enough hours in hearing rooms and greenrooms: a witness with a flair for performance, a committee hungry for a moment, and a gallery of reporters quietly betting which line…
🔥 “THE SMILE FLICKERED—AND THE ENTIRE STUDIO FELT IT.” — Laura Jarrett walked onto the Saturday TODAY set with the kind of calm, polished glow producers dream of. Cameras glided, lights warmed, and the energy felt like a coronation. But right as she settled between Peter Alexander and Joe Fryer, something shifted — a tiny hesitation in her smile, the kind that makes everyone watching sit up a little straighter. And then it came: a voice from outside the studio, sharp enough to snap the broadcast in half. For a full second, no one moved.
Here’s the thing about TV milestones: they’re designed for easy applause. A new co-anchor takes the desk, the chyron beams, the studio lights do their soft-shoe, and everyone is on their best behavior. It’s a ritual as old as morning-show…
🔥 “THE ROOM STOPPED LIKE SOMEONE CUT THE OXYGEN.” — What’s racing across timelines right now isn’t framed as a speech, or an interview, or even a moment. It’s being told like a rupture — the instant Erika Kirk, normally armored in composure, let a single tear fall while standing beside Elon Musk. Witnesses in these viral retellings swear the tear didn’t look emotional… it looked inevitable, like something finally broke through her defenses. And when Musk turned toward her, the entire audience leaned in as if they already knew the world was about to shift.
It was billed as a calm forum on human rights—an hour for big ideas like freedom, transparency, and the obligations that come with having a public voice. The stage was washed in soft gold, the kind of lighting that flatters…
🔥 “THE ROOM WENT DEAD IN UNDER A SECOND.” — What unfolded inside the Senate chamber didn’t look like a hearing anymore — it looked like a trap snapping shut. Adam Schiff sat back with that confident half-smile, clutching a 2021 DOJ memo like it was the final move in a game he thought he’d already won. Staffers say he timed his line perfectly — “Your rhetoric ignores the facts, Senator. Time to face reality.” But instead of rattling Kennedy, something in the senator’s expression made even reporters lean forward, sensing the shift before anyone spoke again.
It didn’t look like much at first—another oversight hearing, another afternoon in a Senate chamber where the oxygen gets thinned out by procedure. Then Adam Schiff leaned into a microphone with a lawyer’s confidence, and John Neely Kennedy pulled out…
End of content
No more pages to load