Major Shake-Up at Fox News: Sandra Smith Officially Replaces Jessica Tarlov on The Five
In a move that caught both fans and critics off guard, Fox News stunned viewers with a live on-air announcement confirming that longtime anchor Sandra Smith will officially replace political commentator Jessica Tarlov on the network’s primetime juggernaut, The Five.
The decision, revealed mid-broadcast in a way that left audiences buzzing, marks one of the most surprising changes in Fox News’ recent history. Known for its unpredictable chemistry, fiery debates, and mix of humor and political theater, The Five has long been a ratings powerhouse for the network. Now, with Smith joining the lineup alongside Greg Gutfeld, Jesse Watters, Dana Perino, and Jeanine Pirro, industry watchers are asking the same question: Is Fox News reinventing its crown jewel—or risking the very formula that made it so dominant?
A Live-TV Bombshell
The announcement came without fanfare or pre-leaked reports, a rarity in the media world where behind-the-scenes decisions often spill out before the official word.
As the show cut to commercial break, co-host Dana Perino teased “big news for The Five family.” When the program returned, viewers were greeted with Smith seated at the table, smiling confidently, as Perino delivered the revelation:
“Starting today, Sandra Smith will be joining us permanently here on The Five.”
The reveal sent immediate shockwaves across social media. Clips of the moment ricocheted across X (formerly Twitter), with hashtags like #SandraSmith and #TheFive trending within minutes. Some viewers cheered the change, praising Smith’s steady presence and sharp questioning style, while others expressed confusion over Tarlov’s sudden absence.
Who Is Sandra Smith?
For longtime Fox News viewers, Smith is no stranger. A veteran anchor, she first gained recognition as co-host of America’s Newsroom and later became known for her incisive political coverage and even-keeled demeanor.
Her background in business and economics, paired with her ability to challenge guests across the political spectrum, has made her a respected voice within the Fox lineup. Unlike the more combative tone of some Fox personalities, Smith has often been described as measured, calm, and analytical—a style that may dramatically alter the dynamic of The Five.
Where Does This Leave Jessica Tarlov?
The bigger mystery remains Jessica Tarlov’s abrupt exit.
As the program’s sole liberal co-host, Tarlov frequently clashed with her conservative colleagues, bringing sharp counterarguments and a progressive perspective to the table. While some viewers found her contributions frustrating, others valued her as a necessary foil, ensuring the show’s debates reflected a spectrum of viewpoints.
So far, Fox has offered no detailed explanation for Tarlov’s departure, and she has not issued a public statement. Rumors swirl about whether she will remain with Fox in another capacity, transition into a different role in media, or possibly step back altogether.
The Stakes for The Five
Since its debut in 2011, The Five has become Fox News’ crown jewel of early evening programming. Its unique format—five co-hosts delivering unscripted commentary on the day’s headlines—quickly built a loyal following.
At its peak, the show has drawn more than 3 million viewers a night, regularly outperforming cable rivals at the same hour. Much of its success stems from the combustible chemistry of its hosts: the quick wit of Greg Gutfeld, the prosecutorial edge of Jeanine Pirro, the polished command of Dana Perino, the populist energy of Jesse Watters, and the ideological tension brought by the lone liberal voice.
By swapping out Tarlov for Smith, Fox is tinkering with the delicate balance that made The Five must-see TV.
Fans React: Cheers, Jeers, and Shock
Reactions from viewers reveal just how divisive the move already is:
Supporters of Smith praised her as a smart, capable anchor who can hold her own against Fox’s heavy hitters. “Sandra brings brains and balance,” one fan tweeted. “She’ll add substance without all the drama.”
Critics of the change worried that removing Tarlov strips the show of its ideological tension. “Without Jessica, this just becomes an echo chamber,” another viewer wrote. “The whole point was the clash of ideas.”
Some fans simply expressed shock. One viral comment read: “Wait—what just happened? Did Jessica even get to say goodbye?”
The mixed reactions highlight the uncertainty: Will Smith elevate the program to new heights—or disrupt the very chemistry that made it thrive?
Media Analysts Weigh In
Television insiders are divided on the implications.
Media analyst Kelly Raines noted:
“Sandra Smith has credibility, professionalism, and star power. This could be Fox’s way of solidifying The Five as not just a partisan shouting match but a serious, ratings-friendly roundtable.”
But industry strategist Mark Geller offered caution:
“You don’t mess with what works. The Five is successful precisely because it’s unpredictable and ideologically diverse. Take away the liberal seat, and you risk alienating the segment of the audience that tuned in for the debate—not just the agreement.”
A Broader Strategy for Fox News?
Some observers see the shake-up as part of a broader realignment at Fox. The network has undergone multiple high-profile host changes in recent years, from Tucker Carlson’s dramatic departure to the reshuffling of its primetime lineup.
In that context, moving Smith into The Five may be less about Tarlov’s exit and more about Fox doubling down on trusted, long-tenured personalities as it navigates a volatile media landscape.
With cable news ratings facing increased pressure from streaming platforms and social media, stability and recognizable talent have become invaluable assets.
What Comes Next
As Sandra Smith takes her seat at the iconic roundtable, all eyes will be on whether she reshapes the tone of the show. Will she challenge her colleagues as fiercely as Tarlov did? Or will her measured style bring a new equilibrium that alters the program’s fiery DNA?
For now, one thing is certain: The Five is entering a brand-new era.
Whether this bold move drives ratings even higher—or sparks backlash that erodes its magic—will become clear in the months to come.
Either way, Fox News has once again demonstrated its willingness to surprise, disrupt, and keep viewers glued to the screen.
News
The auditorium glitched into silence the moment Joel Osteen leaned toward the mic and delivered a line no pastor is supposed to say in public. Even the stage lights seemed to hesitate as his voice echoed out: “God will NEVER forgive you.” People froze mid-applause. Kid Rock’s head snapped up. And in that weird, suspended moment, the crowd realized something had just detonated off-script.
The crowd expected an inspiring evening of testimony, music, and conversation. What they got instead was one of the most explosive on-stage confrontations ever witnessed inside a church auditorium. It happened fast—36 seconds, to be exact.But those 36 seconds would…
The room stalled mid-breath the moment Mike Johnson snapped open a black folder that wasn’t on any official docket. Cameras zoomed. Staffers froze. The label on the cover — CLINTON: THE SERVER SAGA — hit like a siren. Johnson leaned toward the mic, voice sharpened enough to scratch glass, and read a line that made every timeline jolt: “Her email is criminal.”
Here’s the thing about made-for-TV government: it knows exactly when to hold a beat. Tuesday’s oversight hearing had the rhythm down cold—routine questioning, polite skirmishes, staffers passing notes like we’re all pretending this is not a stage. And then Mike…
🔥 “THE FLOOR SHOOK BEFORE ANYONE COULD SPEAK.” — Investigator Dane Bonaro didn’t walk into the chamber — he tore through it, slamming a blood-red binder onto the desk with a force that made the microphones hiss. The label on the cover froze the room mid-breath: “1.4 MILLION SHADOW BALLOTS.” He locked eyes with the council and snarled, “You want the truth? Start with this.” For one suspended second, every camera operator lifted their lens like they’d just smelled a political explosion.
Here’s a scene you’ve watched a hundred times if you’ve spent enough hours in hearing rooms and greenrooms: a witness with a flair for performance, a committee hungry for a moment, and a gallery of reporters quietly betting which line…
🔥 “THE SMILE FLICKERED—AND THE ENTIRE STUDIO FELT IT.” — Laura Jarrett walked onto the Saturday TODAY set with the kind of calm, polished glow producers dream of. Cameras glided, lights warmed, and the energy felt like a coronation. But right as she settled between Peter Alexander and Joe Fryer, something shifted — a tiny hesitation in her smile, the kind that makes everyone watching sit up a little straighter. And then it came: a voice from outside the studio, sharp enough to snap the broadcast in half. For a full second, no one moved.
Here’s the thing about TV milestones: they’re designed for easy applause. A new co-anchor takes the desk, the chyron beams, the studio lights do their soft-shoe, and everyone is on their best behavior. It’s a ritual as old as morning-show…
🔥 “THE ROOM STOPPED LIKE SOMEONE CUT THE OXYGEN.” — What’s racing across timelines right now isn’t framed as a speech, or an interview, or even a moment. It’s being told like a rupture — the instant Erika Kirk, normally armored in composure, let a single tear fall while standing beside Elon Musk. Witnesses in these viral retellings swear the tear didn’t look emotional… it looked inevitable, like something finally broke through her defenses. And when Musk turned toward her, the entire audience leaned in as if they already knew the world was about to shift.
It was billed as a calm forum on human rights—an hour for big ideas like freedom, transparency, and the obligations that come with having a public voice. The stage was washed in soft gold, the kind of lighting that flatters…
🔥 “THE ROOM WENT DEAD IN UNDER A SECOND.” — What unfolded inside the Senate chamber didn’t look like a hearing anymore — it looked like a trap snapping shut. Adam Schiff sat back with that confident half-smile, clutching a 2021 DOJ memo like it was the final move in a game he thought he’d already won. Staffers say he timed his line perfectly — “Your rhetoric ignores the facts, Senator. Time to face reality.” But instead of rattling Kennedy, something in the senator’s expression made even reporters lean forward, sensing the shift before anyone spoke again.
It didn’t look like much at first—another oversight hearing, another afternoon in a Senate chamber where the oxygen gets thinned out by procedure. Then Adam Schiff leaned into a microphone with a lawyer’s confidence, and John Neely Kennedy pulled out…
End of content
No more pages to load
